THE UNIVERSITY AS AGENT OF CHANGE IN THE CITY: CO-CREATION OF LIVE COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE

Rachel Sara, Matthew Jones

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1286

Abstract

Universities have a civic responsibility towards the cities of which they are a part. This is typically operationalised through Outreach and Engagement, which aims to share and apply the expertise and knowledge generated by the university with communities. The model is typically a one-direction path from the University to communities, but there is potential for the engagement to take on more of a two-way collaboration, in which there is an intent to generate new knowledge and enact positive change. This paper reflects on the practice of Hands-on-Bristol, a collective bringing community members, architects, trainee architects, and academics together to co-create projects. This practice is conceived as a form of Spatial Civic Agency that empowers a community organization to participate in making and re-making their places. Projects typically involve a process of co-creation, bringing into consciousness the conditions that shape a community’s place in their world and catalysing possibilities that seemingly cannot otherwise be unlocked. The paper analyses the process of the projects using four key civic agency concepts which identify a need to: Involve the citizen as co-creator; Engage with public and community places; Reconceptualise the role of the professional; and Understand democracy as a lived social and cultural experience grounded in everyday life. The analysis suggests that this participatory approach to education questions the primary focus of education as provider of practice-ready graduates and makes a place for the University as civic agent with transformative potential to co-create more sustainable, resilient communities.


Keywords

community; university; civic agency; co-creation; live projects.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agre, P. E. (2004). The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship. In A. Feenberg and D. Barney (Eds.). Community in the Digital Age (pp.201–23). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

Anderson, J. and Priest, C. (2014). Developing an inclusive definition, typological analysis and online resource for live projects. Architecture Live Projects: Pedagogy into Practice.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224.

Ashkan, M. (2016). The Phenomenological Evaluation Of Teaching Professionalism In The Architecture Design Studio Culture: A Case at the University of Kansas, ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 10 (1), 41-61.

Awan, N. Schneider, T. and Till, J. (2011). Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. London, UK: Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron JC. (1964). Les Héritiers. Les étudiants et leurs études. Paris: Ed. de Minuit.

Boyte, H. (2007) Building civic agency: the public-work approach. From Open Democracy: Free Thinking for the World https://www.opendemocracy.net.

Dahlgren, P (2006). Doing citizenship. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9 (3), 267-286.

Forester, J. (1999). Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Forestiere, C. (2015). Promoting Civic Agency Through Civic-Engagement Activities: A Guide for Instructors New to Civic-Engagement. Journal Of Political Science Education, 11 (4), 455-471.

Friere, P. (1989). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress. Education as the practice of freedom, London: Routledge.

Harriss, H. (Ed.) (2012) Architecture Live Projects, Oxford School of Architecture 2010-12. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.

Harriss, H. (2014). Architecture Live Projects: Pedagogy into Practice. London: Routledge.

Masdéu, M. & Fuentes, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing the Design Studio in Architectural Education: Distance Learning and Blended Learning as Transformation Factors. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 11 (2), 06-23.

Maturana, B. (2010). How Spike and the Slumdweller Find Reality In Design Studio Handouts: An Exploration of Reality In the Design Studio. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4 (2/3). 158-173.

muf architecture/art & J&L Gibbons. (2009). Making Space in Dalston. London: Design For London.

Nicol, D. and Pilling, S. (2000). Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism. London; New York: E & FN Spon.

Petrescu, D. and Petcou, C. (2013). Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. in Sara, R and Mosley, J (eds.) The Architecture of Transgression, Architectural Design, London: Wiley and Sons.

RIBA. (2011). Building Futures: The Future for Architects? London: RIBA.

Rice, L. and Littlefield, D. (2014). Transgression: Towards an Expanded Field of Architecture. London, UK: Routledge.

Salama, A.M. (2015). Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Sara, R. (2011). Learning from life: Exploring the potential of live projects in higher education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 6 (2), 8-25.

Sara, R., Daniels, S., Marco, E., Jones, M. and Burch, J. (2017). Hands On Bristol. http://www.hands-on-bristol.co.uk [Accessed 03.01.18].

Schonfield, K., Dannatt, A., Ainley, R. & muf (2001). This Is What We Do: A Muf Manual. London: Ellipsis.

Stewart, A (2000). Theories of Power and Domination. London, UK: Sage.

Stonarov, T. (2018). The Design-Build Studio: Crafting Meaningful Work in Architecture Education, New York; Abingdon: Routledge.

UN General Assembly. (2016). New Urban Agenda, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 23 December 2016, Seventy-first session, Agenda item 20. From http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/New-Urban-Agenda-GA-Adopted-68th-Plenary-N1646655-E.pdf. [Accessed 03.01.18].

UN. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World, 25th September 2015, http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ [Accessed 24.03.17]

Wink, K. (2005). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. New York: Pearson.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2017

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014