INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN ARCHITECTURE: BETWEEN LEGISLATIONS AND ETHICAL MANIFESTATIONS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE EGYPTIAN CASE

Nehad Mohamed Eweda

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v5i3.209

Abstract

Several international and local legislations have been enacted to protect intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, legislations cannot alone provide protection for architects, and defend the right of owners over architectural products. The importance of this research paper is derived from the hypothesis that accepting, fostering and valuing intellectual property in architecture education and practice are similarly essential to enacting laws. This paper is an analytical discussion of intellectual property in general and particularly in architecture, it is structured in four sections; the first provides a conceptual foundation about intellectual property; the second discusses the issue from an ethical point of view; the third demonstrates various opinions about intellectual property rights; and the last reviews some manifestations in the Egyptian society which affect the intellectual property rights in both the architectural education and practice. Finally, the paper concludes that the lack of awareness among students of architecture as well as practicing architects about intellectual property rights might lead –unintentionally- to violations, infringements, and consequently disputes. In addition, respecting intellectual property would rather begin during the years of architectural education as an ethical behavior, which will continue to regulate the architectural professional practice. Besides, architects need to understand their rights which are granted by the intellectual property legislations in order to consequently secure an atmosphere of fair competition among architects.


Keywords

Intellectual Property; Intellectual Property Rights; Architectural Education; Architectural Profession

Full Text:

PDF

References

Awad, B., El-Gheriani, M., & AbouZeid, P. (2009). Country Report: EGYPT. African Copyright and Access to Knowledge Project. The International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Wits University. South Africa.

Beltrametti S. (2009). The Legality of Intellectual Property Rights under Islamic Law. The Prague Yearbook of Comparative Law. 55-94.

Cornetet, J. (2009). Architecture Copyright Infringement. Retrieved from http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/31/©-architecture-copyrightinfringement/.

Greenstreet, B., Greenstreet, K., & Schermer B. (2005). Law and Practice for Architects. London: Architectural Press.

Hansen, S.A. & VanFleet J.W. (2003). Traditional knowledge and intellectual property: a handbook on issues and options for traditional knowledge holders in protecting their intellectual property and maintaining biological diversity. Washington D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) (2010). Egypt, Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement. Retrieved from www.iipa.com.

MacMurray, R. (2005). Trademarks or Copyright: Which Intellectual Property Right Affords its Owner the Greatest Protection of Architectural Ingenuity?. Northwest Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. Northwestern University School of Law. Vol. 3, No.2. 111-129. Retrieved from http://www.law.northwes-tern.edu/journals/njtip/v3/n2/2/MacMurray.pdf.

Martin, B. (1998). Information Liberation: Challenging the Corruptions of Information Power. London: Freedom Press. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/.

Raslan, H. (2004). Shari’a and the Protection of Intellectual Property – the Example of Egypt. Retrieved from http://law.unh.edu/assets/pdf/ideavol47-no4-raslan.pdf.

Stim, R. (2007). Patent Copyright & Trademark. (9th edition). Berkeley: Nolo Press.

Tankard, J. (2008). Architecture in the Marketplace of Ideas: Copyright and its ‘Chilling’ Effects. Manifold: Design and Knowledge Production (4). Retrieved from http://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/21950/graduate_winner.pdf?sequence=1.

The Egyptian Law on the Protection of Intellectual

Property Rights. No. 82 of year 2002. Book 3, English Edition.

The Egyptian Syndicate of Engineers (2011). Retrieved from http://www.eea.org.eg.

UIA (2006). UIA Accord on Recommended International Standards of Professionalism in Architectural Practice. Professional Practice

Commission. Third Edition. France. Retrieved from www.uia-architectes.org.

Weinberg P. J. (2004). Architectural Copycats — Whose House Are You Building, Anyway?. Zoning and Planning Law Report, 27 (4).

World Intellectual Property Organization (2010). Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int.

Xuan L. & Carlos M. (2009). Intellectual Property Enforcement, International Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR



ABOUT US


- ISSN (Online) #1938 7806 - ArchNet-IJAR is covered by ArchNet@ MIT Libraries, Avery Index to Architectural Periodicals, EBSCO, CNKI, Pro-Quest, Scopus-Elsevier, Web of Science.

- Published work in ArchNet-IJAR is licensed under Creative Commons: CC-BY--NC-ND license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

Copyrights © Archnet-IJAR 2007-2018

 
 

Hit Counter
Visitor Hits Since 15 Jan 2014